| Demystifying the Adjusted recognition for Gender calculation |
|
| Sunday, 08 April 2007 22:00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The draft codes of good practice
made allowances for gender. In many aspects an enterprise could earn
points under employment equity for black people, and additional points
for black women. This always translated in extra indicators of some of
the elements - one indicator for black people and another for black
women. Last year cabinet and the minister decided to reduce and
simplify the number of indicators on the scorecard. The concept of
gender adjustment was born.
Whereas previously the scorecard had two indicators - the new scorecards use the following wording in for example the QSE scorecard, employment equity.
Black employees of the measured entity as a percentage of all employees adjusted using the Adjusted Recognition for Gender (my italics)
How does this adjusted recognition for gender work, and is it less complicated than the old codes?
The codes use two formulae
A = B/2 + C
Where A is the adjusted recognition for gender
B is the percentage of employees who are black people
C is the percentage of employees who are black women
There actual calculation for points is:
A = B/C X D
Where A is the score achieved
B is the adjusted recognition for gender calculated above
C is the target for that indicator
D is the weighting
At first glance this is quite complicated - the math sometimes seems quite daunting.
Let us use a practical example;
Rules to follow:
Worked example:
Let us say that in this business there are 12 top management. Of that 3 are black males and 1 is a black female, i.e. there are 4 black people in top management
Then we know than 33.3% of all top management is black people and 8.3% of top management are black females (1/12).
Copyright ©
EconoServ SA 8th
March 2007 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated ( Monday, 07 May 2007 05:53 ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||